People
Stewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.
Stewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.
The removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.
Also a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which Law360 selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.
For nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.
In addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes.
J.D., Mercer University, Magna Cum Laude
B.B.A., University of Georgia
Georgia
Georgia Court of Appeals
Georgia Superior Court
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
American Bar Association
Atlanta Bar Association
State Bar of Georgia
September 29, 2023
Stewart Haskins counsels Home Depot before the Third Circuit, which declined to revive a consumer class action against the company
Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.
Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).
Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.
See more
May 17, 2016
Supreme Court Rules Plaintiff Must Suffer “Concrete Harm” to Sue
January 25, 2016
Is there a silver lining for defendants in the recent class action decision by the Supreme Court?
July 16, 2015
New FCC Order Expands Liability for Businesses Under the TCPA
September 29, 2023
Stewart Haskins counsels Home Depot before the Third Circuit, which declined to revive a consumer class action against the company
Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.
Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).
Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.
See more
May 17, 2016
Supreme Court Rules Plaintiff Must Suffer “Concrete Harm” to Sue
January 25, 2016
Is there a silver lining for defendants in the recent class action decision by the Supreme Court?
July 16, 2015
New FCC Order Expands Liability for Businesses Under the TCPA
September 29, 2023
Stewart Haskins counsels Home Depot before the Third Circuit, which declined to revive a consumer class action against the company
J.D., Mercer University, Magna Cum Laude
B.B.A., University of Georgia
Georgia
Georgia Court of Appeals
Georgia Superior Court
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
American Bar Association
Atlanta Bar Association
State Bar of Georgia