Facing mass tort litigation of emotionally charged cases that threaten its reputation and business operations, GlaxoSmithKline has turned to King & Spalding to defend its franchise drug, Paxil, and its bottom line for over a decade.
Out of nearly 7,700 cases, only four have gone to trial – two in which we achieved dismissals and two that found for the plaintiff, but with considerably smaller damages than requested.
Suicide/
Violence
Following an adverse plaintiff’s verdict in 2001 that triggered additional lawsuits, GSK retained K&S to defend against claims that Paxil caused patients to harm themselves or others.
Discontinuation
Litigation triggered by plaintiffs’ lawyers learning of complaints about symptoms said to occur after discontinuing Paxil and other antidepressants and a subsequent labeling change.
Pregnancy
Litigation was triggered by a pregnancy-category change in FDA labeling/prescribing classification, and scientific research into a potential antidepressant/birth defect connection.
K&S maintained a consistent focus on the medical science and proven facts. This enabled K&S to navigate the emotional aspects of the case while presenting scientific, factual and legal rationales for dismissal.
For this case, GSK needed both national reach and local knowledge, which K&S was able to deliver. Multiple related issues required the expertise of highly specialized legal teams in jurisdictions that posed great risk. At the height of the litigation, it required 100 lawyers and paralegals to work collaboratively from a number of practice groups across K&S offices in Atlanta, Charlotte, Washington, D.C., New York, Houston, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Successful “360 representation” combines experienced leadership, access to specialized legal expertise and longstanding relationships with local counsel in cities across the U.S.